
Accounts don't get blown because of bad entries. They get blown because every decision is made from scratch, in the moment, under the pressure of price and your own emotions.
A trader's trading plan takes that load off. When the rules are written down before you open the terminal, only one question is left at the moment of the trade: is there a signal or isn't there. Everything else has already been decided.
Below we'll go through how to build a trading plan from scratch, give you a trading plan template to copy, and show the mechanics of how people break down. Writing the text is easy. Living by it for a month is much harder.
![[Placeholder: terminal workspace with the order book, tape and clusters]](https://api.secret-terminal.com/uploads/image_2026_02_03_10_37_14_7c32b8dca3.png)
A trading plan is a written set of entry, exit, risk and schedule rules that a trader puts together before the session and doesn't change during it. The point of the document is one thing: move decision-making out of the stressful moment and into the calm one.
The difference shows up in the numbers. A trader without rules changes position size after every run of trades. Two wins in a row, in he goes with triple size. Takes a stop, goes in again to win it back. Within a week the distribution of results is random, and you can't collect statistics on a "system" like that.
The second effect is less obvious. A plan gives you data. Without written rules you won't be able to say why the month came out negative. Are the rules bad? Or did you break them? Those are different problems with different fixes, and you can only tell them apart against rules you actually recorded.
A third point almost nobody talks about. A plan saves attention. A scalper processes hundreds of micro-decisions per session, and the cognitive tank runs dry after roughly 2 hours. Every rule moved into the document frees part of that tank for reading the order book and the tape.
I noticed the difference when I stopped deciding "how much to take" right at the moment of entry. I calculate size before the session, three fixed tiers based on the instrument's volatility, and my hand just presses the right button.
A working document fits on 2 pages. Anything longer and you won't read it. Four blocks cover roughly 90% of the situations you face at the terminal.
The first thing you lock in is the time horizon. Scalping, intraday and swing require different software, a different account size and a different amount of screen time. You can't mix them in one document: the exit rules will start fighting each other.
A scalper needs access to order flow: the order book, the tape and clusters. A swing trader doesn't need any of that, the daily chart and levels are enough. Work in both modes at once and you'll inevitably start sitting through scalp positions, explaining it away as "switching to swing".
Next comes the instrument list. Not "cryptocurrencies", but specific tickers. Selection runs on objective filters: daily volume above $100M, at least 800 thousand trades per day, a one-minute candle covering around 1% or more. An instrument like that gives you enough movement and enough liquidity to get out at the price you want.
Write down separately what you don't trade. Fresh listings with no volume, coins with near-zero liquidity, pairs where the order book is empty and price jumps 3–4 ticks at a time. A list of bans works better than a list of permissions, because it kills impulsive entries into the rocket of the day.
An entry is described through a set of filters that have to line up at the same time. One signal means nothing. Two already give you a statistical edge.
The base combination for trading order flow looks like this:
Demanding all five is pointless, that happens rarely. A normal bar is three out of five, with the fifth mandatory every time.
The exit is described by three scenarios. On profit (price reached the target or an opposing density level in the order book). On the stop (price went past the level that the trade's logic depended on). And the third one, which beginners usually forget: exit on a broken idea. You got in on a bounce off a density level, the density level got pulled in 4 seconds, price hasn't reached the stop yet, but there's no trade anymore. Get out manually.
The stop goes where the structure says, not where the dollar amount says. First you find the price at which the idea is disproven, then you size the position off the distance to it. The reverse order ("I want to risk $50, I'll put the stop at 0.3%") breaks everything: the stop lands inside normal noise and gets taken out at random.
If you're still working out where density levels come from and why price reacts to limit orders, watch free lesson from our course on the Secret Terminal YouTube channel. It covers the order book, limit orders and entry points, and it's part of the full free course on crypto trading and scalping.
Here everything comes down to four numbers. Write them once, don't touch them for at least a month.
Risk per trade. From 0.5% to 1% of the account. On a $5,000 account that's $25–50 of potential loss. Sounds small? That's exactly why most people don't make it to year two.
Daily loss limit. Usually 3 stops in a row or 3% of the account, whichever comes first. Hit it and you close the terminal. Not "one last trade to get it back", you physically shut the software down.
Maximum weekly drawdown. 6–8%. When you hit it, you go review your statistics and come back at half size.
Working sizes. Pre-calculated amounts for different instruments, for example $1,000, $2,500 and $5,000. No need to do math in the moment, you just pick a tier.
An example calculation. $5,000 account, 1% risk, so $50. Entry on BTC/USDT, structural stop 0.4% from the entry point. Position size = 50 / 0.004 = $12,500, at 10x leverage that's $1,250 of margin. With a 1.2% stop the size would drop to $4,167, and on the account it would look like a completely different trade, even though the dollar risk is the same.
That kind of arithmetic evens out your results. Trades that single-handedly wipe out half a month's profit stop showing up.
The crypto market runs around the clock, and that's a trap. You can't trade 24/7, and everyone feels the pull to get in "just one more time at 1 a.m.".
The plan locks in:
Separately, write out the conditions under which you don't trade at all. Short on sleep, running a fever, a fight at home, important macro data in 20 minutes. Sounds obvious, but those are exactly the days that produce the biggest losses: reactions are slower, self-control is drained.
Copy it, plug in your own values. Anything you leave blank won't work.
1. Identification
2. Instruments
3. Entry conditions
At least 3 of 5 filters:
Entry only on limit, or at market on a confirmed impulse. Chasing price that's already gone is forbidden.
4. Exit conditions
5. Risk
6. Schedule
7. Bans
Writing the plan is 5% of the work. The other 95% is living by it for at least 20 trading sessions in a row.
A breakdown almost always develops the same way. First a small violation that made money. You got in without the third filter, caught the move, earned. Your brain filed away the link "broke the rules = made money". Two days later the violation repeats, then it becomes normal, and a week after that there are effectively no rules.
Which leads to the main point: a trader's trading plan is judged not by the result of an individual trade, but by what percentage of it followed the rules. A losing trade that followed the plan is a good trade. A profitable trade with a violation is a bad trade, even if the balance went up.
What actually helps you hold the line:
The journal is the key tool here, and almost nobody keeps one by hand in a spreadsheet for longer than two weeks. The "Journal" module in Secret Terminal records trades over API: the performance calendar colors each day green or red, the cumulative curve shows drawdowns, and the position card opens up time in trade, fees, funding rate and a second-by-second fill history. For metrics and how to review entries, read the article "Trading journal: how to keep one".
There's one more layer, the psychological one. Violations happen not from ignorance, but from the urge to win it back, from the fear of missing a move, and from boredom on days with no signals. That's tilt, FOMO and gambling addiction, and they're treated not with willpower but with the structure of your day. We covered the mechanics in "Trading psychology: how to manage emotions"and "Discipline in trading".
My personal breakdown marker is simple. The moment I catch myself thinking "I'll just win this back quickly and I'm done", the session is over. Learned that one the expensive way, wouldn't recommend repeating it.
We put the basic theory on the terminal and order flow into free lesson on the interface: order book, clusters, tape and workspace. The lesson is part of the full free course on YouTube.
A plan won't save you in three situations, and it's worth understanding that before you get disillusioned with the whole approach.
First: the rules describe a strategy with no edge. Disciplined execution of a losing system gives you a smooth, predictable bleed. Faster than chaos, because there are more trades.
Second: extreme volatility. In a liquidation cascade the order book empties out, the spread widens 10–20 times, the stop fills 2% worse than calculated. A 1% risk turns into 3%, and nothing you wrote down will change that. The mechanics of a cascade are covered in the article "Futures liquidation: mechanics and the liquidation map".
Third: an account under $300–500. Fees and slippage eat such a share of the result that the statistics stop reflecting the quality of your decisions.
An example from practice. SOL/USDT, entry on a bounce off a density level in the order book, structural stop under the level, $50 risk, 1.5R target. Everything passed the filters: the level was there, the density level was there, the tape accelerated, delta was positive. Forty seconds later a rate headline hit, the density level was taken out with a single market order, price went through the stop and filled 0.6% lower. A $78 loss instead of $50, minus 1.56R. The trade was correct, the result was worse than calculated, and there's one conclusion: the "no news in the next 10 minutes" item gets checked against the calendar, not against memory.
From 2 to 4 hours for the first version, if you already have statistics on at least 100 trades. Without statistics the document will come out theoretical, and you'll have to rewrite it in a month. For a beginner it makes more sense to trade minimum size for a month while keeping a journal, and then formalize what actually works.
As a skeleton, yes. As a working document, no. Someone else's rules are built around their life schedule, account size, reaction speed and drawdown tolerance. A person who sits calmly in a position 5% underwater and a person whose hands shake at 1% can't trade the same rules.
Once a month or after every 50–100 trades, whichever comes later. Inside a trading week the rules don't change at all. Edits right after a run of losses are the worst option: the decision is being made on emotion, not on data.
First check your compliance percentage. If the rules were followed in fewer than 80% of trades, the rules aren't the problem. If compliance is high and the result is still negative, break it down by group: separately per instrument, separately by time of day, separately by entry type. Usually the loss is concentrated in one segment, for example morning trades on low-liquidity pairs, and switching that segment off is enough.
You need it more than anyone. A scalper has no time to think in the moment, all the analysis is done in advance. Scalping rules are usually shorter and stricter: fixed sizes, fixed entry filters, a hard daily stop. Plus a separate item on technique, meaning configured hotkeys and order book layouts.
If you can't reproduce the entry conditions from memory, it's too complicated. A working trading plan fits in your head in full, and the paper version is there for cross-checking and discipline. More than 5–6 entry filters means you'll be ignoring some of them anyway.
A target expressed as a return percentage does more harm than good: it pushes you to force trades at the end of the month. Process goals are more useful, meaning the number of trades taken by the rules, the percentage of journal entries filled in, no daily-stop violations. The money follows if the process is built right.
A plan without a tool stays text. To execute order-flow entry rules you need to see that flow in real time: density levels in the order book with lifetime timers, the tape with noise filtering, clusters with delta and POC.
Secret Terminal brings that together in one workspace for Windows 64-bit, with direct API connections to Binance, Bybit, OKX, WhiteBIT and MEXC. Keys are stored locally on your device and never go to third-party servers. The Journal and the "Accounts" module cover the other half of the job: tracking rule compliance and auditing your statistics.
Download the terminal at secret-terminal.com, set the workspace up for your style, and trade by the rules instead of by feel.

Has 5 years of trading experience and spent 3 years as a mentor, training over 2,000 students. He is developing Secret Terminal to make professional trading tools accessible to every trader.
Was helpful
Your rating will help us improve the quality of published materials and increase their usefulness.
We publish product updates, setup guides, and practical materials on working with Secret Terminal tools

10 rules of trading discipline that distinguish a pro from a beginner.

Trader psychology: fear, greed, tilt, FOMO. How to manage emotions and protect your account when trading cryptocurrency...

How to keep a trader’s trading journal: template, examples, and rules. Why there will be no progress without a journal....